Dating discussion groups
I think that the problems are completely unavoidable.Almost all dating sites have questionnaires and algorithms, but those things can only go so far.(On the whole, college women are more interested in longer-term relationships, while college men are more interested in casual hook-ups; in a situation where women outnumber men and are essentially competing for a scarce resource, the women are more likely to enter into relationships that don't meet their ideal criteria--basically, the men have more power here.)Besides being entertaining, some of the studies here are pretty sobering.For example, there's a higher birth rate among teens in states with higher levels of social inequality.It's a strange situation when there are so many people at your fingertips that you must decide which ones you are going to message and which ones you are not.So you have to come up with some way of deciding which is, in the end, going to be pretty arbitrary.
Adshade focuses on online dating, which puts a more quantitative spin on this major life decision, while acknowledging that the intangibles can actually contribute much more to a successful relationship.I get overwhelmed with too much choice with pretty much everything, so I have no idea if my experience is similar to other users'.And though I complain about the sites, let the record state that I haven't gone on a date or even had a dating-type conversation with anyone I didn't meet online since college.It recounts relevant economic studies in a surprisingly readable way, grouping them into thematic chapters that roughly follow the course of a human life: we encounter a chapter about college promiscuity near the beginning, a chapter about marriage in the middle, and a chapter about relationships among seniors at the end.Each of these chapters offers up interesting and often surprising analysis, including the idea that colleges with higher ratios of women to men have higher rates of casual sex.